This section of the Visible Value aims to provide a quick overview of the state of the affairs about the recognition of youth work in the countries covered by EU-CoE Youth Partnership. In total it covers 53 country profiles (including 3 profiles for Belgium and 4 profiles for the UK).

The content in this section is based on several sources, including:

The sources of information are indicated at the end of each profile.

Back Finland

As stated in the Youth Act, youth work means ‘the efforts to support the growth, independence and social inclusion of young people in society. The Youth Act also defines the roles and responsibilities of the local authorities, youth associations and other organisations realising youth work. Based on the Act, the responsibility of providing youth work services offered at a local level in municipalities rests with the local government: ‘local governments are obligated, with due consideration to local conditions, to create the necessary preconditions for local youth work and activities by providing services and premises for young people and supporting their civic engagement.’

Youth work is generally seen as an independent agent. It is financed by the state, local authorities and parishes. There is youth worker education in vocational education, in universities of applied sciences and on the university level. Even a doctoral program at the University of Tampere exist. There has been education on youth work in formal education since 1945. Youth work is mentioned in the National Core Curriculum as one of the co-operating partners for schools. There are many policy programmes in different policy levels integrating youth work services to service systems. Youth workers have associations. There is a state-sponsored network of centres of excellence for promoting youth work (one of them financing the original reporter of this template). The political and social recognition of youth work is in relatively good shape at the moment and has increased in the current decade. According to the future expectations survey done by an umbrella organisation of youth organisations, Allianssi, 80% of the respondents thought that the significance of youth work has increased in the last five years. Over 80% believed that the significance of youth work will increase in the future as well (Nuorisotyön tulevaisuusodotukset 2017). The recognition of learning taking place in youth work has, however, not been on the agenda in Finland. For example, in the study comparing recognition and validation in the IVS, Finland was among the countries least interested in providing recognition (Kiilakoski 2015, Youth work, volunteering, recognition and employability). Also, the discourse of learning has been slow to develop in Finland. A notable exception is the Scouts, who have been developing recognition tools in co-operation with the representatives of formal education systematically. One of the concrete tools developed has been called the Digital Competence Disk. The competence disc shows how accumulated competence (as translated into credits) gained through some specific hobbies and volunteering can be recognised in some specific studies leading to a qualification, for example: Basic Training for Guide and Scout Leaders can now be recognised as a part of a Bachelor's of Humanities, Community Education in HAMK Häme University of Applied Sciences and at Humak University of Applied Sciences.

Also, youth workshops that have been developed since the 1980s have been actively developing different recognition and validation tools to make visible the learning taking place in these facilities. There are no national competency descriptions, nor are there legal requirements for youth workers. This is due to the emphasis on professional autonomy and decentralisation policies, which together mean that the core decisions are made on the local level.

(from the EKCYP Country report on youth work in Bulgaria, complemented by data from the Youth Wiki)